Polling Size 47 is an initiative in the US state of Oregon passed in 1996, affecting property tax assessments and institutionalizing the provision of a dual majority for tax laws. Measure 50 is a revised version of the law, which was also ratified, after being referred to voters by the state legislature of 1997.
Size 47, sometimes referred to as "cut and cap" law, reduces property tax to 1994-95 tax or 1995-96 tax minus 10% and limited future increase in valued property values, except for new or additional construction, up to 3% per year. It also instituted a rule of "double majority" requiring at least 50 percent voter turnout for all local tax actions in most elections (partially repealed in 2008 by Measure 56). This reinforces the constitutional limit of the state, first imposed by Measuring 5, on property taxes in real estate.
Size 47 was placed on the ballot by an initiative petition by anti-tax activist Bill Sizemore and approved by voters in the November 1996 election, with 704,554 votes in favor and 642,613 opposing votes.
The law enacted by Size 47 was amended in 1997, when the Oregon Legislative Assembly called Ukur 50 to voters to clarify that Size 47 is intended to limit the increase in real estate valuations to 3 percent per year. The move passed.
Video Oregon Ballot Measures 47 (1996) and 50 (1997)
Ukur 47
The move was sponsored by Bill Sizemore and taxpayer tax group Oregon Taxpayers, as part of the Oregon tax rebellion. Proponents are disappointed with the rise in property taxes, largely due to an increase in the value of real estate in the Portland area. Proponents are concerned about the choice of retribution when there is little awareness of the issue and the number of voters is expected to be low. Under Oregon law, two regularly scheduled state elections, a major election in May and a general election in November, are held on even an even year. In addition, four regularly scheduled elections can be held at the local level each year. Beyond this, the legislature may call a special election at any time.
Opponents fear that reducing taxes will lead to dismissal of schools outside those who are blamed on Measure 5. Furthermore, they are opposed to the rule of a double majority, arguing it gives non-voters more political power than those who are willing to vote.
Confusion arises about the possible effect of Size 47. The Petitioners claim that Size 47 will limit property valuations - property values ​​are determined by regions - to prevent taxes raised by more than three percent each year. Others claim that Size 47 does not prevent such action. Sizemore puts the argument in the Oregon voter guide in an attempt to clarify the provisions of that measure. Nevertheless, the legislature sent Ukur 50 to the voters next year to clarify that the limit applied to the assessed value of the property as well.
Double majority rule
Measures 47 "double-majority" rules set by Oregon, which places additional requirements on state and local taxes. The rule applies to all elections other than general elections held on even-year. For levy or referral initiatives to pass other elections, not only do more voters should choose "yes" than "no", but at least 50 per cent of registered voters must vote in elections. The double majority is a type of supermajority similar to the absolute majority.
In the United States, elections include presidential elections, held even years every four years on Election Day, Tuesday after the first Monday of November. Elections also include a part-time election in which members of Congress, state legislators, and some state governors are elected on Election Day in the mid-year between presidential elections.
Because the Size 47 section, the requirements of a dual majority have led to the defeat of many of the proposed local taxes. According to the League of Oregon Cities, between 1997 and 2007 of 1,358 the total tax step on the ballot in the state, 616 passes and 742 failed, and 169 of those failures resulted from a dual majority rule. In response, local governments usually prefer to place such measures on an election ballot.
This measure also causes attempts to clean up the registration rolls of voters. Registered voters who have died or moved are considered "No" votes with a dual majority requirement. (By law, the Oregon voting action is given the word so "No" means "no change" and "Yes" means "adopting size.")
In 1998, Measure 53 attempted to reverse the provisions of a dual majority but only won 49% of the vote.
In 2007, activists representing schools, public unions, and business interests lobbied the Oregon Legislative Council to reduce the terms, and in June 2007 both legislative assemblies had approved a Joint Resolution Together 15, placing the size before voters in November 2008 voting. This size appears as Size 56, and will exclude elections held in May and November of any year from the dual majority requirements. It was then ratified by voters on November 4, 2008. The proponents of the so-called double-majority rule act are undemocratic because, in their view, the rules give non-voters an unfair influence in the democratic process by allowing them to make failed measures that otherwise won. supporting most of those who actually vote. They also argue that because the voting system is through an exclusive Oregon ballot, which makes it easier to choose, there is no reason for people not to vote. Opponents consider unfairly the idea that a small percentage of people can impose a new tax on others. They argue that a double-majority rule is needed to prevent this from happening, and claims that if revoked, taxes will rise too much.
Maps Oregon Ballot Measures 47 (1996) and 50 (1997)
Measure 50
Measurements 50 were delivered to voters by the Oregon Legislature in 1997. After passing by voters, size was replaced Size 47. Problems with Measuring 47 Measures 50 were addressed to address including lack of accuracy about property tax assessments, unintended consequences, and vulnerability to legal challenges.
Measure 50 approved by voters in a special election May 20, 1997, with 429,943 votes in favor, and 341,781 votes against.
Following the section of Step 47, as part of the ongoing anti-tax movement in Oregon, there is some confusion as to how the size will be interpreted by the court. One interpretation has a ballot size reducing the property tax revenue of $ 458 million in fiscal year 1997-1998, while another interpretation, provided by the Oregon Attorney General, has provided a reduction of only $ 270 million. Much of this disagreement relates to what limits Size 47 will occur to an increase in the valuation of property values.
Measure 50 limits the adjustments in property tax assessments. Advocates argue that Measuring 50 is needed to avoid a lengthy legal battle as well as budget uncertainty about the possible effects of Size 47. Opponents argue that Measuring 50, rather than rewriting 47, is an attempt to ease restrictions imposed by Size 47. Indeed, the estimated financial impact of Measure 50 is a reduction of $ 361 million, rather than Measuring 47 which was meant $ 458 million reduction.
See also
- Oregon Ballot Measure 25 (1996), specifies different supermajorency requirements in the Legislature
- Oregon Ballot Measure 5 (1990)
- List of Oregon polling actions
References
External links
- Oregon's Means Guide to Measuring 47 - including full text of size, and arguments for and against
- Oregon Guide Guides page for Measuring 50 - including full text of size, explanatory statements, financial impact estimates, and arguments for and against.
Source of the article : Wikipedia
0 Comments